A Guide to Health Insurance Plans for Businesses

Introduction

At JMR Benefit Strategies, we understand that as a CFO, managing the financial aspects of your company's employee benefits program is one of your top priorities. Health insurance is a significant part of these benefits, and understanding the various funding mechanisms available can help you make informed decisions that balance cost and coverage effectively. In this blog, we’ll take a closer look at four main funding mechanisms for employee health plans: fully insured, self-insured, level-funded, and captives.

Fully Insured Health Plans

A fully insured health plan is the traditional approach where your company pays a fixed premium to an insurance carrier. The carrier takes on the risk and handles everything, from claims processing to regulatory compliance. Here are some key points:

  • Predictable Costs: You pay a fixed premium, making budgeting straightforward.

  • Risk Transfer: The insurance carrier assumes all the risk for claims, protecting your company from high-cost claims.

  • Simplified Administration: The carrier manages all administrative tasks, reducing the burden on your HR and finance teams.

  • Regulatory Compliance: The carrier ensures the plan complies with state and federal regulations.

However, fully insured plans can be more expensive because the insurance carrier builds in profit margins and administrative costs, often leading to overcharging and significant increases in annual premiums.

Self-Insured Health Plans

In a self-insured (or self-funded) health plan, your company assumes the financial risk for providing health care benefits to employees. Instead of paying a fixed premium to an insurer, you pay for the actual claims incurred. Here’s what you need to know:

  • Cost Savings: Potential savings can be significant, especially if your employees are generally healthy and claims are lower than expected.

  • Flexibility: Greater control over the plan design allows you to tailor benefits to meet the specific needs of your workforce.

  • Risk: Your company assumes the financial risk of high claims, which can be mitigated through stop-loss insurance.

  • Administrative Responsibility: Effective management of administrative tasks is essential, often involving third-party administrators (TPAs) to handle the workload efficiently.

Self-insured plans are often more suitable for larger organizations with the financial stability to absorb fluctuations in claims costs.

Level-Funded Health Plans

Level-funded plans combine elements of both fully insured and self-insured plans. You pay a fixed monthly amount that covers expected claims, stop-loss insurance, and administrative fees. If actual claims are lower than expected, you may receive a refund or credit. If claims are higher, stop-loss insurance limits your liability. Here are the benefits:

  • Predictable Costs: Like fully insured plans, level-funded plans offer predictable monthly costs.

  • Potential Savings: Savings can occur if actual claims are lower than expected.

  • Risk Mitigation: Stop-loss insurance protects against catastrophic claims.

  • Flexibility: Some control over the plan design is retained.

Level-funded plans are an attractive option for mid-sized employers looking for predictability and potential savings without assuming full risk.

Captive Insurance Arrangements

A captive insurance arrangement involves a group of employers forming their own insurance company. This captive entity provides health insurance to the member companies. Here’s what to consider:

  • Shared Risk: Risk is spread across the captive members, reducing exposure for any single employer.

  • Cost Control: Captives can be more cost-effective as they eliminate the profit margin and administrative overhead of traditional insurers.

  • Customization: Significant control over plan design allows for tailored benefits to specific needs.

  • Long-Term Strategy: Captives are often a long-term commitment, requiring careful consideration and planning.

Captive arrangements are typically more complex and may be best suited for mid-sized organizations or industry groups with the resources to manage an insurance entity.

Conclusion

Choosing the right funding mechanism for your employee health plan is a critical decision that impacts your company's financial health and employee satisfaction. Fully insured plans offer simplicity and risk transfer, while self-insured plans provide cost savings and flexibility. Level-funded plans combine predictability with potential savings, and captive arrangements offer cost control and customization through shared risk.

Carefully evaluating your organization's size, financial stability, and risk tolerance is essential when selecting a funding mechanism. Each option has its advantages and considerations, and the right choice will depend on your specific circumstances and objectives.